CLIMATEGATE-Najveća prijevara u povijesti

[monkey20]

Pa zar nitko ovdje nema pojma šta se događa.Evo copy past(engleski) a ostatak googlajte.FOX (youtube) je najbolje popratio ostali šute ko zaliveni.Internet bruji o tome.
LJUDI PROBUDITE SE I OTVORITE OČ!!!!!

A potentially major scandal is unfolding after someone released
thousands of e-mails and documents sent between prominent scientists of
global warming debate. The New York Times has verified that these
e-mails are legitimate which wasn’t too hard because some of them were
written by and to one of their reporters. More on that here in just a
second. But first let’s start with the science that has been so settled
for all these years. What do these guys say behind closed doors about
their so-called bullet-proof consensus? Well, Kevin Trenberth, he’s a
climatologist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. He
wrote, “The fact is we can’t account for the lack of warming at the
moment and it’s a travesty that we can’t.” Incorrect data? Inadequate
systems? Yeah. Travesty, pretty good word for it.
How about Phil Jones, head of of the Climate Research Unit at the
University of East Anglia, “I have just completed Mike’s nature trick
of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years to
hide the decline.” Yes, he is talking about a trick that another
scientist previously used in a peer reviewed journal to apparently hide
the decline in temperatures. Incredible. But it doesn’t stop there.

How about when scientific journals published material that Jones
didn’t like? Quote “I can’t see either of these papers being in the
next IPCC report…Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we
have to redefine what the peer review literature is” end quote. Think
about that next time you hear about, oh, “the consensus,” and “the
science is settled,” and Al Gore is bragging about the peer reviewed
journals

Now what happens to a peer reviewed paper when they disagree with
what gets published? Quote “…our only choice is to ignore this paper.
They have already achieved what they wanted.” But at least they are not
intentionally deleting documents or hiding information, right? Oh, no,
they’re doing that, too. Here is Phil Jones writing Michael Mann, the
scientist that came up with that Hockey Stick graph, that one. He said,
“Mike, can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re: AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family
crisis…Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have
his new email address. We will get Caspar to do likewise.” Count them.
There’s Jones, Mike, Keith, Gene, and Caspar, whoever they are,
potentially deleting e-mails supposedly about supposed science.

So why all the secrecy? Well, we find out from another e-mail from
Michael Mann about skeptic Steven McIntyre. “I’m sure you are aware
that McIntyre and his ilk realize they no longer need to get their crap
published in legitimate journals [you know, the one's they're cycling!
] but all they have to do is put it up on their blog and the contrarian
noise machine kicks into gear. Pretty soon Drudge, Rush Limbaugh, and
Glenn Beck and their ilk are parroting the claims.”

So you see, if McIntyre sees the data, he’ll find the tricks that
are in it to hide the decline, and then crazy people like me might just
let you know about it. Oh, the horror what will happen to cap and
trade? That e-mail was sent from one of the scientists to a New York
Times reporter. That same reporter, Andrew Revkin, thankfully did
report on the story for the New York Times, but he will not post the
documents because, quote “The documents appear to have been acquired
illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements
that were never intended for the public eye, so they won’t be posted
here.” Oh, well, I know, the New York Times would never post or print
anything that wasn’t intended for the public eye, like, maybe, the way
we monitor terrorists or specific strategies to protect our troops in
the field. No, no, the New York Times, they’re above that.

Deleting e-mails, hiding declines, incorrect data, inadequate
systems, redefining scientific peer reviews for their own uses! This is
what appears to be going on behind the scenes and literally trillions
of dollars of policy decisions are being based on what these guys are
telling us. If your gut said, “Wait a minute, this global warming thing
sounds like a scam.” Well, I think you’re seeing it now. We told you
this was going on, without proof, because we listened to our gut. You’d
never believe me, but once again, here we are with yet another brand
new reality.

Indeed.

[monkey20]

Evo par linkova

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIl2gdDtbCg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNbxYVa2VjA

[damfisk]

Pa zar nitko ovdje nema pojma šta se događa.
...
LJUDI PROBUDITE SE I OTVORITE OČ!!!!!

Ne, nemamo pojma. Mi smo kreteni.

Srećom, došao si ti, pa ćeš nas prosvijetlit.

Hvala ti, o veliki prosvjetitelju!

[stjepan666]

o čemu se zapravo radi???

[industrial]

Pa zar nitko ovdje nema pojma šta se događa.Evo copy past(engleski) a ostatak googlajte.FOX (youtube) je najbolje popratio ostali šute ko zaliveni.Internet bruji o tome.
LJUDI PROBUDITE SE I OTVORITE OČ!!!!!

Rano si to vidio...

priča datira iz 2005

U.S. Pressure Weakens G-8 Climate Plan
Global-Warming Science Assailed

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 17, 2005

[monkey20]

Ljudi ovo je staro 10 dana.Googlajte malo da videite o čemu se radi.Emailovi su im hakirani i pušteni u javnost..

[monkey20]

Evo vam skoro sve svijetske vijesti sa hrv prijevodom(desna strana).Ovo je veliko!

http://www.youtube.com/user/CowboyBe.../0/p_uwMPIyssE

[damfisk]

Ma šta veliko - najveće!

Srećom, ti si tu pa nas uredno izvještavaš...

Hvala ti na tome

[monkey20]

Ovo će biti najveća prijevara u povijesti čovječanstva.

[monkey20]

Da ne bude nesporazuma ova priča oko CLIMATEGATE-a je stara ali prije nekoliko dana su procurili mailovi koji su digli veliku prašinu u svijetu a naši mediji šute o tome.